POSIX cpu timers were calling find_task_by_vpid in insecure way
(since 4221a9918e38b7494cee341dda7b7b4bb8c04bde which requires
RCU read-side critical section).
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
| We can remove the tasklist_lock while at it. rcu_read_lock is enough.
Patch also replaces thread_group_leader with has_group_leader_pid
in accordance to comment by Oleg Nesterov:
| ... thread_group_leader() check is not relaible without
| tasklist. If we race with de_thread() find_task_by_vpid() can find
| the new leader before it updates its ->group_leader.
|
| perhaps it makes sense to change posix_cpu_timer_create() to use
| has_group_leader_pid() instead, just to make this code not look racy
| and avoid adding new problems.
Thanks to:
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
BTW, Oleg, in turn, fixed security issue
commit e0a70217107e6f9844628120412cb27bb4cea194
Author: Oleg Nesterov <>
posix-cpu-timers: workaround to suppress the problems with mt exec
---
diff --git a/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
index 6842eeb..05bb717 100644
--- a/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -37,13 +37,13 @@ static int check_clock(const clockid_t which_clock)
if (pid == 0)
return 0;
- read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
p = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
if (!p || !(CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(which_clock) ?
- same_thread_group(p, current) : thread_group_leader(p))) {
+ same_thread_group(p, current) : has_group_leader_pid(p))) {
error = -EINVAL;
}
- read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return error;
}
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ int posix_cpu_timer_create(struct k_itimer *new_timer)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new_timer->it.cpu.entry);
- read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(new_timer->it_clock)) {
if (pid == 0) {
p = current;
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ int posix_cpu_timer_create(struct k_itimer *new_timer)
p = current->group_leader;
} else {
p = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
- if (p && !thread_group_leader(p))
+ if (p && !has_group_leader_pid(p))
p = NULL;
}
}
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ int posix_cpu_timer_create(struct k_itimer *new_timer)
} else {
ret = -EINVAL;
}
- read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment